Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and antifibrotic treatments focus on experimental studies

7Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Context.-Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive fatal disease that up to now has been associated with a poor outcome. Some advances have been made in understanding the multiple interrelated pathogenic pathways underlying IPF. The disease is now believed to result from complex interactions among genetic, epigenetic, transcriptional, posttranscriptional, metabolic, and environmental factors. The discovery and validation of theranostic biomarkers are necessary to enable a more precise and earlier diagnosis of IPF and to improve the prediction of future disease behavior. Two drugs recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, pirfenidone and nintedanib, have shown the ability to reduce the progression of the disease, although survival benefits are only minimal and neither drug prevents or reverses the disease. Objective.-To provide a critical overview of the main experimental studies carried out for testing the principal effects of pirfenidone and nintedanib on IPF. Data Sources.-Experimental (animal and in vitro) studies concerning both drugs were used. Conclusions.-Pirfenidone has a longer history of preclinical experimental studies than nintedanib. Many studies have been reported more recently (after 2014) and some of them evaluated the association of both drugs, thus suggesting their combination in future therapeutic approaches. Future investigations focusing on targets at molecular, cellular, and tissue levels are necessary to have a better in-depth knowledge of the properties of these drugs and to explore the potential efficacy of both or other drug combinations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lunardi, F., Pezzuto, F., Vuljan, S. E., & Calabrese, F. (2018). Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and antifibrotic treatments focus on experimental studies. In Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Vol. 142, pp. 1090–1097). College of American Pathologists. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2018-0080-RA

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free