Governing antimicrobial resistance: a narrative review of global governance mechanisms

48Citations
Citations of this article
124Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), a central health challenge of the twenty first century, poses substantial population health risks, with deaths currently estimated to be around 700,000 per year globally. The international community has signaled its commitment to exploring and implementing effective policy responses to AMR, with a Global Action Plan on AMR approved by the World Health Assembly in 2015. Major governance challenges could thwart collective efforts to address AMR, along with limited knowledge about how to design effective global governance mechanisms. To identify common ground for more coordinated global actions we conducted a narrative review to map dominant ideas and academic debates about AMR governance. We found two categories of global governance mechanisms: binding and non-binding and discuss advantages and drawbacks of each. We suggest that a combination of non-binding and binding governance mechanisms supported by leading antimicrobial use countries and important AMR stakeholders, and informed by One Health principles, may be best suited to tackle AMR.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ruckert, A., Fafard, P., Hindmarch, S., Morris, A., Packer, C., Patrick, D., … Labonté, R. (2020, December 1). Governing antimicrobial resistance: a narrative review of global governance mechanisms. Journal of Public Health Policy. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-020-00248-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free