Analysis of tissue changes, measurement system effects, and motion artifacts in echo decorrelation imaging

  • Hooi F
  • Nagle A
  • Subramanian S
  • et al.
18Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Echo decorrelation imaging, a method for mapping ablation-induced ultrasound echo changes, is analyzed. Local echo decorrelation is shown to approximate the decoherence spectrum of tissue reflectivity. Effects of the ultrasound measurement system, echo signal windowing, electronic noise, and tissue motion on echo decorrelation images are determined theoretically, leading to a method for reduction of motion and noise artifacts. Theoretical analysis is validated by simulations and experiments. Simulated decoherence of the scattering medium was recovered with root-mean-square error less than 10% with accuracy dependent on the correlation window size. Motion-induced decorrelation measured in an ex vivo pubovisceral muscle model showed similar trends to theoretical motion-induced decorrelation for a 2.1 MHz curvilinear array with decorrelation approaching unity for 3–4 mm elevational displacement or 1–1.6 mm range displacement. For in vivo imaging of porcine liver by a 7 MHz linear array, theoretical decorrelation computed using image-based motion estimates correlated significantly with measured decorrelation (r = 0.931, N = 10). Echo decorrelation artifacts incurred during in vivo radiofrequency ablation in the same porcine liver were effectively compensated based on the theoretical echo decorrelation model and measured pre-treatment decorrelation. These results demonstrate the potential of echo decorrelation imaging for quantification of heat-induced changes to the scattering tissue medium during thermal ablation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hooi, F. M., Nagle, A., Subramanian, S., & Douglas Mast, T. (2015). Analysis of tissue changes, measurement system effects, and motion artifacts in echo decorrelation imaging. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(2), 585–597. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4906580

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free