US Fiscal Policy and Asset Prices: The Role of Partisan Conflict

18Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Fiscal policy shocks exert wide-reaching effects, including movements in asset markets. US politics have been characterized historically by a high degree of partisan conflict. The combination of increasing polarization and divided government leads not only to significant Congressional gridlock, but also to spells of high fiscal policy uncertainty. This paper adds to the literature on the relationships between fiscal policy and asset prices in the US economy conditional on the degree of partisan conflict. We analyze whether a higher degree of partisan conflict (legislative gridlock) reduces the efficacy of the effect and response of fiscal policy on and to asset price movements, respectively. We find that partisan conflict does not significantly affect the relationships between the fiscal surplus to gross domestic product (GDP) and housing and equity returns. Rather, if important, partisan conflict affects the actual implementation of fiscal policy actions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gupta, R., Lau, C. K. M., Miller, S. M., & Wohar, M. E. (2019). US Fiscal Policy and Asset Prices: The Role of Partisan Conflict. International Review of Finance, 19(4), 851–862. https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12188

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free