The Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in ESL/EFL Context: A Synthesis of Present and Past Studies

3Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The current study provides literature review on research conducted over the past four decades focused on written corrective feedback (WCF). This metanalysis reveals that, although the field of WCF has matured, there is still considerable debate among research scholars over its efficacy. This article provides a synthesis of the literature on WCR in five areas the efficacy: (1) of WCF, in general; (2) of different forms of WCF; (3) of focused versus unfocused WCF; (4) of WCF on revised and new pieces of writing; and (5) of the results of WCF studies and the instructional context. Research has thus shown the general usefulness of WCF and examined a host of variables that influence it, such as the focus of the WCF, the nature of the target grammatical structure, forms of WCF, and instructional teaching context.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mujtaba, S. M., & Singh, M. K. M. (2023). The Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in ESL/EFL Context: A Synthesis of Present and Past Studies. Mextesol Journal, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.61871/mj.v47n1-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free