Is Non-reductive Physicalism Viable within a Causal Powers Metaphysic?

17Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The chapter presents a version of the causal exclusion challenge to nonreductive physicalism regarding mental states, one that is explicitly directed at non-reductive physicalists who adopt an ontology of causal powers. It considers whether a satisfying reply to the argument can be fashioned on the basis of Sydney Shoemaker's novel account of the mental-physical realization relation, most recently in his book Physical Realization. It is argued that Shoemaker's strategy does not provide a plausible reply to the argument. Three broad alternatives to non-reductive physicalism available to the causal powers metaphysician are then discussed: reduction, elimination, and ontological emergence. It is contended that while all of them are at present viable approaches to special science properties generally, there is special reason to affirm the irreducibility and efficacy of mental properties and so to conclude that mental properties are unrealized, ontologically emergent features of their subjects.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Connor, T., & Churchill, J. R. (2010). Is Non-reductive Physicalism Viable within a Causal Powers Metaphysic? In Emergence in Mind. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199583621.003.0004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free