The diffusion and development of time-geography in East Asia: The academic life paths of two key scholars

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A summary of the diffusion and development of time-geography in East Asia, specifically in Japan and China, is presented in this article. Previous studies have provided reviews of time-geographic research and space-time behaviour research in both countries. Few studies, however, have told the story about how and why time-geography diffused into East Asia. By showing and analysing the academic life paths of Yoshio Arai and Yanwei Chai, we conclude that the development of time-geography in Japan and China goes hand in hand with their academic progress. Moreover, the interactions within their academic life paths mark some key events that promoted time-geography significantly. The similarities and differences between their academic life paths are also analysed in this article. Both scholars shared some common research topics, such as childcare problems, urban spatial structures and socioeconomic transformations, which were also the most prominent characteristics of time-geography in East Asia. In addition, the socioeconomic backgrounds of their academic life paths are also quite similar, which reflects the close relationship between time-geography and societal needs. Finally, this article discusses the effectiveness and disadvantages of the academic life path method, as the method has proven to be an important tool in analysing the role that key scholars play in promoting a certain discipline. In conclusion, the diffusion and development of time-geography in East Asia can hardly have happened without both individual scholars' hard work and the exchange and cooperation activities between scholars.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, C., Chai, Y., & Arai, Y. (2020). The diffusion and development of time-geography in East Asia: The academic life paths of two key scholars. Moravian Geographical Reports, 28(4), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2020-0025

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free