Association between angiotensin-converting enzyme I/D polymorphism and asthma risk: A meta-analysis involving 11,897 subjects

17Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background. Genetic susceptibility to asthma has been a research focus in the scientific community. Several studies have been conducted in recent years to evaluate the risk of asthma and insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE). However, the results remain conflicting rather than conclusive. Methods. We carried out a search in Medline, EMBASE, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database for relevant studies. Data were extracted using a standardized form and pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95 confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the strength of the association. Results. Our meta-analysis on 11,897 subjects from all available studies showed that the DD genotype was associated with increased asthma risk than those with the II (OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.20-2.12) or ID/II (OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.24-2.10) genotype. Stratified analyses by ethnicity (Europeans and Asians) and age (adults and children) obtained statistically similar results in the two genetic models. In the subgroup analysis by source of controls, the DD genotype was associated with a significantly elevated risk of asthma among population-based controls (DD vs. II: OR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.45-3.56) but not hospital-based controls (DD vs. II: OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.93-1.49). Conclusions. This meta-analysis provides strong evidence that the I/D polymorphism of ACE is associated with asthma risk. Additional well-designed large studies were required for the validation of our results, especially in African populations. © 2012 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ding, Q. L., Sun, S. F., Cao, C., & Deng, Z. C. (2012). Association between angiotensin-converting enzyme I/D polymorphism and asthma risk: A meta-analysis involving 11,897 subjects. Journal of Asthma, 49(6), 557–562. https://doi.org/10.3109/02770903.2012.685540

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free