Long-term safety of spinal cord stimulation systems in a prospective, global registry of patients with chronic pain

33Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: The availability of long-term (>2 years) safety outcomes of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) remains limited. We evaluated safety in a global SCS registry for chronic pain. Methods: Participants were prospectively enrolled globally at 79 implanting centers and followed out to 3 years after device implantation. Results: Of 1881 participants enrolled, 1289 received a permanent SCS implant (1776 completed trial). The annualized rate of device explant was 3.5% (all causes), and 1.1% due to inadequate pain relief. Total incidence of device explantation >3 years was 7.6% (n = 98). Of these, 32 subjects (2.5%) indicated inadequate pain relief as cause for removal. Implant site infection (11 events) was the most common device-related serious adverse event (<1%). Conclusion: This prospective, global, real-world study demonstrates a high-level of safety for SCS with low rate of explant/serious adverse events.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rauck, R. L., Loudermilk, E., Thomson, S. J., Paz-Solis, J. F., Bojrab, L., Noles, J., … Jain, R. (2023). Long-term safety of spinal cord stimulation systems in a prospective, global registry of patients with chronic pain. Pain Management, 13(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.2217/pmt-2022-0091

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free