Quo Vadis Pengecualian Kebijakan Dari Objek Gugatan di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara di Era Pandemi Covid-19

Abstract

The issuance of Perppu Number 1 of 2020 in the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic, has invited a number of controversies. One of the articles that also received criticism was Article 27 paragraph (3). Article a quo negates every action, including decisions, is not the object of the PTUN lawsuit. This is clearly contrary to the principle of the rule of law which guarantees the protection of the law and human rights. PTUN is one of the means of legal protection and human rights for people who are harmed by decisions or actions of state administration. By examining library materials or secondary data and using legislation, concepts, and historical approaches, this article will focus on two problem formulations, namely whether all actions and decisions according to the Perppu are included in the object of the PTUN lawsuit? and why are these actions and decisions excluded from the object of the Administrative Court lawsuit? After conducting an in-depth investigation, the actions and decisions based on the Perppu are indeed the objects of the PTUN lawsuit, but theoretically-juridically the exceptions from the object of the lawsuit mandated by the Perppu are justified.