Toll-Like Receptor 4 and Toll-IL-1 Receptor Domain-Containing Adapter Protein (TIRAP)/Myeloid Differentiation Protein 88 Adapter-Like (Mal) Contribute to Maximal IL-6 Expression in Macrophages

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that engagement of Toll-like receptors (TLR) 2 and 4 can induce macrophages to express a variety of proinflammatory cytokines. We have recently demonstrated that TLR2 agonists poorly induce a subset of TLR4-inducible proinflammatory genes (e.g., inducible protein (IP)-10, inducible NO synthase (iNOS), monocyte chemoattractant protein-5, IL-12p40), due in part to differential activation of IFN-β production and phosphorylation of the transcription factor STAT1. TLR4, but not TLR2, agonists can induce IFN-β expression via a mechanism that requires the adapter protein Toll-IL-1R domain-containing adapter protein (TIRAP)/myeloid differentiation protein 88 (MyD88) adapter-like (Mal), but not the adapter protein MyD88. Thus, the failure of TLR2 agonists to induce STAT1-dependent genes results, in part, from their failure to induce the expression of IFN-β. In this study, we show that IL-6 expression is also preferentially induced by activation of TLR4. TLR4-dependent induction of IL-6 expression did require Toll-IL-1R domain-containing adapter protein (TIRAP)/MyD88 adapter-like (Mal), but unlike iNOS and IP-10, it did not require the expression of IFN-β. Although exogenous IFN-β and IFN-γ could synergize with TLR2 agonists to restore high levels of iNOS expression and NO production, these IFNs could not synergize with TLR2 agonists to induce high levels of IL-6. Similarly, neutralizing anti-IFN Abs could block iNOS gene expression in LPS-stimulated murine macrophages, whereas these Abs had little effect on IL-6 gene expression in these cells. Together, these studies demonstrate that IL-6, like iNOS and IP-10, is differentially expressed in macrophages stimulated via TLR2 vs TLR4, although these differences appear to arise from distinct signaling mechanisms.