Abstract
In 2022, the CDC revised its and encourage clinicians to weight the risks versus harms of continued therapy and empathetically engage patients in patient-centered discussions around continued therapy while avoiding patient abandonment. This commentary discusses how the emphasis on “benefit” will almost always lead to discordance between the patient and provider since many clinicians find little benefit in opioid therapy for chronic pain with evidence questioning its efficacy for chronic pain. This disagreement between patients and providers has the potential to lead to unilateral tapers or patient abandonment and further increase patient harm. Considering this dilemma, we propose a revised framework that emphasizes weighing the harms of continuation of therapy against the harms of discontinuation of therapy when caring for patients on long-term opioid therapy. This revised harm-reductive decisional framework has the potential to retain patient-provider trust and increase opportunities for engagement in evidence-based multi-modal pain treatment, including non-opioid based treatment options.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Lagisetty, P., & Kertesz, S. (2023, July 1). Harms Versus Harms: Rethinking Treatment for Patients on Long-Term Opioids. Substance Abuse. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/08897077231190697
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.