Golub–Kahan vs. Monte Carlo: a comparison of bidiagonlization and a randomized SVD method for the solution of linear discrete ill-posed problems

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Randomized methods can be competitive for the solution of problems with a large matrix of low rank. They also have been applied successfully to the solution of large-scale linear discrete ill-posed problems by Tikhonov regularization (Xiang and Zou in Inverse Probl 29:085008, 2013). This entails the computation of an approximation of a partial singular value decomposition of a large matrix A that is of numerical low rank. The present paper compares a randomized method to a Krylov subspace method based on Golub–Kahan bidiagonalization with respect to accuracy and computing time and discusses characteristics of linear discrete ill-posed problems that make them well suited for solution by a randomized method.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bai, X., Buccini, A., & Reichel, L. (2021). Golub–Kahan vs. Monte Carlo: a comparison of bidiagonlization and a randomized SVD method for the solution of linear discrete ill-posed problems. BIT Numerical Mathematics, 61(4), 1093–1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10543-021-00857-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free