Single shot versus continuous technique adductor canal block for analgesia following total knee arthroplasty: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis

24Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: An adductor canal block (ACB) provides recognized analgesia following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This metaanalysis compared the single-injection ACB (SACB) with the continuous-injection ACB (CACB). Method: Relevant studies were searched from PubMed (1996-October 2018), Embase (1980-October 2018), and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL, October 2018). Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which compared SACB with CACB, were included in our meta-analysis. Results: Four RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Our pooled data indicated that the SACB group had similar efficacy compared with the CACB group in terms of morphine consumption (P=.19), time to first opioid request (P=.32), range of motion (P=.97), and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 24hours at rest (P=.12) and movement (P=.24), without increasing the risk of complications (P=.97) and length of stay (P=.54). Conclusion: The SACB technique provides similar analgesia in the 24hours following TKA compared with CACB, while the CACB method was better over 48hours.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, L. K., Zhang, B. Y., Quan, R. F., Xu, H., Sun, Y. J., & Zhou, J. H. (2019). Single shot versus continuous technique adductor canal block for analgesia following total knee arthroplasty: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis. Medicine (United States), 98(20). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015539

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free