Comparative analysis of various aspects of plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius COM.TEC cell separator instruments

4Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the Fenwal Amicus and the Fresenius COM.TEC apheresis instruments regarding donor peripheral blood parameters, operational variables of the instruments, and quality control parameters of the product obtained. Methods: We performed 100 platelet collections from 100 voluntary donors using the 2 studied devices. We measured platelet count using an automated analyzer and analyzed the activation statuses using a flow cytometer. Results: The median time needed to perform the procedures was significantly longer with the COM.TEC. However, the product we obtained using the Amicus instrument showed higher degrees of platelet-activation. All products we obtained with both instruments had white blood cell counts of less than 5 × 106 per bag. We observed no statistical difference regarding collection efficiency and collection rates between the devices. Conclusion: Both instruments collected platelets efficiently, with minimal donor discomfort. Compared with the COM.TEC instrument, the Amicus reached the platelet target yield more quickly; however, it displayed an increase in platelet activation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Philip, J., Biswas, A. K., Chatterjee, T., & Mallhi, R. S. (2014). Comparative analysis of various aspects of plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius COM.TEC cell separator instruments. Laboratory Medicine, 45(4), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1309/LM491RNLMWLFHIMS

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free