Abstract
Objective: To compare the Fenwal Amicus and the Fresenius COM.TEC apheresis instruments regarding donor peripheral blood parameters, operational variables of the instruments, and quality control parameters of the product obtained. Methods: We performed 100 platelet collections from 100 voluntary donors using the 2 studied devices. We measured platelet count using an automated analyzer and analyzed the activation statuses using a flow cytometer. Results: The median time needed to perform the procedures was significantly longer with the COM.TEC. However, the product we obtained using the Amicus instrument showed higher degrees of platelet-activation. All products we obtained with both instruments had white blood cell counts of less than 5 × 106 per bag. We observed no statistical difference regarding collection efficiency and collection rates between the devices. Conclusion: Both instruments collected platelets efficiently, with minimal donor discomfort. Compared with the COM.TEC instrument, the Amicus reached the platelet target yield more quickly; however, it displayed an increase in platelet activation.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Philip, J., Biswas, A. K., Chatterjee, T., & Mallhi, R. S. (2014). Comparative analysis of various aspects of plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius COM.TEC cell separator instruments. Laboratory Medicine, 45(4), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1309/LM491RNLMWLFHIMS
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.