Burden of proof and standards of proof: two reminiscences of the past

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The burden of proof and the standard of proof are two institutions that come from the old system of legal or expressly allowed assessment of evidence, in which they made full sense. However, in the free assessment system, the institution of the burden of proof ceases to be useful, and the standards of proof become simple imitations of the old categories “probatio plena” and “probatio semiplena” that are impossible to objectify. This article provides extensive detail and justification for the above conclusions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nieva-Fenoll, J. (2020). Burden of proof and standards of proof: two reminiscences of the past. Estudios de Derecho, 77(170), 117–148. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.esde.v77n170a05

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free