The relative utility of cardiac troponin I, creatine kinase-MBmass, and myosin light chain-1 in the long-term risk stratification of patients with chest pain

6Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Sensitive and specific cardiac markers convey important short-term prognostic information about patients with an acute coronary syndrome. There are, however, few data assessing their value as long-term predictors. Hypothesis: The aim of the current study was to assess the relative value of three such markers and clinical characteristics in determining the long-term prognosis of patients with chest pain. Methods: Cardiac troponin I (cTnI), myosin light chain-1 (MLC-1), and creatine kinase-MBmass levels were obtained on admission (0 h) and at 4, 8, 16, and 24 h in 208 patients with chest pain. Eligible subjects were determined, at the time of hospital admission, to be at > 7% risk of acute myocardial infarction (MI), but without new ST-segment elevation on their presenting electrocardiogram. Follow-up was performed a median of 28 (range 1-46) months later. The primary study endpoint was death or nonfatal MI, subsequent to the index admission. Results: Cardiac TnI levels ≥0.2 ng/ml (odds ratio [OR] 1.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-3.40) and MLC-1 levels ≥1 ng/ml (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.83-5.73) were both significant predictors of death or MI during long-term follow-up; MLC-1 was, however, the only independent biochemical predictor (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.14-3.93). Conclusions: Both cTnI and MLC-1 predict the long-term outcome of patients with chest pain, but, in this cohort, MLC-1 proved to be a better predictor of mortality and nonfatal acute MI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hillis, G. S., Taggart, P., Wardlaw, D., Hillis, L., Zhao, N., Dalsey, W. C., & Mangione, A. (2003). The relative utility of cardiac troponin I, creatine kinase-MBmass, and myosin light chain-1 in the long-term risk stratification of patients with chest pain. Clinical Cardiology, 26(3), 147–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.4960260310

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free