Dissociating Cognitive Processes During Ambiguous Information Processing in Perceptual Decision-Making

33Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Decision-making requires the accumulation of sensory evidence. However, in everyday life, sensory information is often ambiguous and contains decision-irrelevant features. This means that the brain must disambiguate sensory input and extract decision-relevant features. Sensory information processing and decision-making represent two subsequent stages of the perceptual decision-making process. While sensory processing relies on occipito-parietal neuronal activity during the earlier time window, decision-making lasts for a prolonged time, involving parietal and frontal areas. Although perceptual decision-making is being actively studied, its neuronal mechanisms under ambiguous sensory evidence lack detailed consideration. Here, we analyzed the brain activity of subjects accomplishing a perceptual decision-making task involving the classification of ambiguous stimuli. We demonstrated that ambiguity induced high frontal θ-band power for 0.15 s post-stimulus onset, indicating increased reliance on top-down processes, such as expectations and memory. Ambiguous processing also caused high occipito-parietal β-band power for 0.2 s and high fronto-parietal β-power for 0.35–0.42 s post-stimulus onset. We supposed that the former component reflected the disambiguation process while the latter reflected the decision-making phase. Our findings complemented existing knowledge about ambiguous perception by providing additional information regarding the temporal discrepancy between the different cognitive processes during perceptual decision-making.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maksimenko, V. A., Kuc, A., Frolov, N. S., Khramova, M. V., Pisarchik, A. N., & Hramov, A. E. (2020). Dissociating Cognitive Processes During Ambiguous Information Processing in Perceptual Decision-Making. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00095

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free