A critique of Standard ML

8Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Standard ML is an excellent language for many kinds of programming. It is safe, efficient, suitably abstract, and concise. There are many aspects of the language that work well. However, nothing is perfect: Standard ML has a few shortcomings. In some cases there are obvious solutions, and in other cases further research is required. © 1993, Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Appel, A. W. (1993). A critique of Standard ML. Journal of Functional Programming, 3(4), 391–429. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956796800000836

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free