In the shadow of the public: Enlightenment and the pitfalls of modernity

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The Enlightenment has often been presented as the ideological programme of modernity, the set of ideas and values from which modern, democratic and secularized Western societies have emerged. This reading, however, fails to account for the diversity and polyphony of the Enlightenment. Another reading, that of Michel Foucault, insisted on the ethos of modernity that the Enlightenment would have brought: a critical relationship with the present and current events. Conversely, this interpretation neglects the militant and collective dimension of the Enlightenment that favoured emancipation through knowledge. This article suggests, rather, seeing in the Enlightenment a way of problematizing modernity, of thinking about its contradictions. It develops this argument from a case study: the philosophes' reflections on the public and its ambivalences. The optimism of the Enlightenment's fight against prejudice was counterbalanced by a more pessimistic analysis of the new public space and of the media obstacles to the dissemination of knowledge and critical thinking.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lilti, A. (2020). In the shadow of the public: Enlightenment and the pitfalls of modernity. International Journal for History, Culture and Modernity. Brill Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/22130624-20200004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free