SAW, TOPSIS, PROMETHEE Method as a Comparison Method in Measuring Procurement of Goods and Services Auction System

6Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In the procurement of goods and services POKJA conduct auctions and decide the results of the auction. The decision taken will assist POKJA to asses and deterMine the winner of procurement and goods and services auction. Decision making base on some criteria and complexity in the assessment of attribute and benefit. Multi - criteria decision making helps to find best alternative base on existing data. Aim of this paper is to compare three available multi - criteria decision making (MCDM) methods (SAW, TOPSIS and PROMETHEE) for the auction application. Multi-criteria decision making is needed to calculate the strength in each stage of the procurement selection process. Where multi-criteria decision making decision support system is used in seeing the strength and rank ranking of the winning candidate for goods and services procurement. The result of the research are Promethee method that is good in performance, stability, saw, and topsis. They are good in computation and transparency base on analysis rank, reference rank and review rank. The implication is to provide alternative to select the winner of goods and services auction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pangaribuan, P., & Beniyanto, A. (2018). SAW, TOPSIS, PROMETHEE Method as a Comparison Method in Measuring Procurement of Goods and Services Auction System. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 407). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/407/1/012045

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free