Examining nonadherence in the treatment of tuberculosis: The patterns that lead to failure

17Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims: Adherence has been shown to be a major predictor of tuberculosis treatment failure and relapse. The current adherence metrics can be improved to provide higher resolution of adherence patterns and identify patients in need of alternative treatment interventions. We investigated how adherence patterns affect treatment outcomes, when adherence is likely to decrease during treatment and which patients are at risk of being nonadherent. Methods: Individual-level data were pooled from 3 clinical trials (n = 3724) for treatment of drug susceptible tuberculosis where monthly or weekly adherence patterns were collected and adherence patterns were quantified to assess the impact of clustered missed doses vs. randomly missed doses on tuberculosis treatment outcomes. Significance was determined through univariate and multivariate cox regression models. Results: Patients who miss doses in clusters have an increased hazard risk for unfavourable outcomes and missing as little as 4 treatment days in 1 month resulted in 61% higher risk of unfavourable outcomes compared to patients who missed no treatment days (P

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fox, W. S., Strydom, N., Imperial, M. Z., Jarlsberg, L., & Savic, R. M. (2023). Examining nonadherence in the treatment of tuberculosis: The patterns that lead to failure. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 89(7), 1965–1977. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15515

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free