Retrospective Analysis of Treatment Outcomes and Geriatric Assessment in Elderly Malignant Lymphoma Patients

18Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In recent years, the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA), which is used in gerontology to assess functioning in elderly individuals, has been said to be useful in geriatric oncology. Therefore, we examined whether items in the CGA were associated with survival time in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). We conducted the CGA for 93 patients aged ≥ 65 years who had undergone treatment for NHL retrospectively. The CGA includes activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, mood, cognition, nutrition, and the Charlson comorbidity index. For each category, we divided subjects into a "good" group and a "poor" group. In regard to the Charlson comorbidity index, patients were divided into two groups using different cutoffs to divide the groups; the two groups were established according to the division with the largest significant difference in survival time. Multivariate analysis was then performed with the following prognostic factors affecting survival: all CGA items, NHL classification, stage, performance status, and doxorubicin use/non-use. We also performed similar analysis for 43 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients who had undergone anthracycline treatment. Results are factors affecting survival in NHL cases included comorbidity score ≥ 6 (P < 0.0001), doxorubicin non-use (P = 0.005), and cognitive impairment (P = 0.0488). In cases of DLBCL, survival was affected by comorbidity score ≥ 5 (P = 0.0016). High comorbidity score was strongly associated with survival in both NHL and DLBCL.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Naito, Y., Sasaki, H., Takamatsu, Y., Kiyomi, F., & Tamura, K. (2016). Retrospective Analysis of Treatment Outcomes and Geriatric Assessment in Elderly Malignant Lymphoma Patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hematopathology : JCEH, 56(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.3960/jslrt.56.43

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free