Abstract
Virginia's new stormwater regulations involve the use of the Runoff Reduction Method (RRM), a methodology to estimate a volume reduction in predicted runoff. Regulations require that for downstream erosion control, the product of the peak flow rate and runoff volume (Q*RV) from one-year storm events in the post-development condition be reduced to less than pre-development Q*RV. This study models different bioretention sizing scenarios in a developed watershed in Blacksburg, Virginia to determine the performance at both the sub-watershed and watershed levels. In addition, models of " optimal " bioretention cells, sized to meet the RRM for each sub-watershed, are evaluated. A direct relationship is observed between the size of the cell required to meet the RRM and the sub-watershed's developed Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) curve number, and a sizing analysis is provided. Modeling shows that the required size of " optimal " cells for many sub-watersheds exceeds conventional bioretention designs. Upon applying the RRM for all sub-watersheds, the resulting hydrograph at the watershed outlet more closely resembles the pre-development hydrograph than existing development.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Buckland, B. A., Dymond, R. L., & Hodges, C. C. (2015). Using Bioretention Retrofits to Meet Virginia’s New Stormwater Management Regulations: A Case Study. Environment and Natural Resources Research, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v5n2p135
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.