Sprint conditioning of junior soccer players: Effects of training intensity and technique supervision

30Citations
Citations of this article
167Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aims of the present study were to compare the effects of 1) training at 90 and 100% sprint velocity and 2) supervised versus unsupervised sprint training on soccer-specific physical performance in junior soccer players. Young, male soccer players (17 ±1 yr, 71 ±10 kg, 180 ±6 cm) were randomly assigned to four different treatment conditions over a 7-week intervention period. A control group (CON, n=9) completed regular soccer training according to their teams' original training plans. Three training groups performed a weekly repeated-sprint training session in addition to their regular soccer training sessions performed at A) 100% intensity without supervision (100UNSUP, n=13), B) 90% of maximal sprint velocity with supervision (90SUP, n=10) or C) 90% of maximal sprint velocity without supervision (90UNSUP, n=13). Repetitions x distance for the sprint-training sessions were 15×20 m for 100UNSUP and 30×20 m for 90SUP and 90UNSUP. Single-sprint performance (best time from 15×20 m sprints), repeated-sprint performance (mean time over 15×20 m sprints), countermovement jump and Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Level 1 (Yo-Yo IR1) were assessed during pre-training and post-training tests. No significant differences in performance outcomes were observed across groups. 90SUP improved Yo-Yo IR1 by a moderate margin compared to controls, while all other effect magnitudes were trivial or small. In conclusion, neither weekly sprint training at 90 or 100% velocity, nor supervised sprint training enhanced soccer-specific physical performance in junior soccer players.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haugen, T., Tønnessen, E., Oksenholt, Ø., Haugen, F. L., Paulsen, G., Enoksen, E., & Seiler, S. (2015). Sprint conditioning of junior soccer players: Effects of training intensity and technique supervision. PLoS ONE, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121827

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free