Abstract
The antinociceptive effect of morphine and oxycodone is mediated preferentially at μ and κ receptors, respectively. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic profile of the combination of morphine and oxycodone in cancer pain, compared to the standard administration of morphine alone. Controlled-release formulations of oxycodone (CRO) and morphine (CRM) were compared in 26 patients. The study started with an open-label, randomised titration phase to achieve stable pain control for 7 days, followed by a double-blind, randomised crossover phase in two periods, 14 days each. At any point, patients were allowed to use oral immediate-release morphine (IRM) as needed, in order to keep visual analogue scale ≤ 4. Pain, satisfaction, adverse effects and number of daily rescue morphine tablets were assessed. A total of 22 patients were evaluated. The weekly upload consumption ratio in morphine/ oxycodone was 1:1.8 (1.80, 1.83, 1.76, 1.84). The weekly IRM consumption was higher in patients having CRM compared to patients having CRO (ratio morphine/oxycodone: 1.6, 1.6, 1.6, 1.7) (P < 0.05). Patients receiving oxycodone complained of less nausea and vomiting. The rescue morphine analgesic consumption was 38% higher in patients receiving only morphine, compared to patients receiving both morphine and oxycodone. The results suggest that the combination of morphine/oxycodone (opioids with differential preferential sites of action) can be a useful alternative to morphine alone, resulting in a better analgesia profile and less emesis. © 2003 Cancer Research UK.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Lauretti, G. R., Oliveira, G. M., & Pereira, N. L. (2003). Comparison of sustained-release morphine with sustained-release oxycodone in advanced cancer patients. British Journal of Cancer, 89(11), 2027–2030. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601365
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.