A framework to classify gestational diabetes diagnosed by routine antenatal 75g glucose tolerance testing

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To create an objective framework to classify gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed by routine antenatal 75 g diabetes testing results to provide an alternative to current treatment-based classification. Methods: A framework was created to classify gestational diabetes according to the severity of glycemic abnormalities after routine antenatal 75 g GTT (classes 1 through 4, determined by fasting and post-test glycemic abnormalities). A retrospective cohort chart review was used to correlate clinically how often diet therapy alone maintained glycemic targets throughout pregnancy in each class. Chi-square analysis was used to assess inter-class differences in the success of diet therapy alone maintaining glycemic targets throughout pregnancy. Results: Seventy-four of 228 (33%), 35/228 (15%), 76/228 (33%), and 43/228 (19%) of the study population were classified as Class 1, 2, 3, or 4, respectively. Of eighty-nine patients who maintained glycemic targets throughout pregnancy with diet alone 51/89 (57%) were Class 1, 20/89 (22.5%) were Class 2, 11/89 (12.5%) were Class 3, and 7/89 (8%) were Class 4. Chi-square analysis showed statistically significant inter-class differences in the likelihood of diet therapy alone maintaining glycemic targets throughout pregnancy. Conclusion: In this framework classifying gestational diabetes according to the severity of glycemic abnormalities after routine antenatal 75 g GTT (an objective proxy for disease severity), the higher the assigned class, the less likely that diet therapy alone maintained glycemic targets throughout pregnancy (a clinical proxy for disease severity).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bernasko, J. (2024). A framework to classify gestational diabetes diagnosed by routine antenatal 75g glucose tolerance testing. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2373393

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free