Advances in and Limitations of Up-and-down Methodology

  • Pace N
  • Stylianou M
  • Warltier D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Sequential design methods for binary response variables exist for determination of the concentration or dose associated with the 50% point along the dose–response curve; the up-and-down method of Dixon and Mood is now commonly used in anesthesia research. There have been important developments in statistical methods that (1) allow the design of experiments for the measurement of the response at any point (quantile) along the dose–response curve, (2) demonstrate the risk of certain statistical methods commonly used in literature reports, (3) allow the estimation of the concentration or dose—the target dose—associated with the chosen quantile without the assumption of the symmetry of the tolerance distribution, and (4) set bounds on the probability of response at this target dose. This article details these developments, briefly surveys current use of the up-and-down method in anesthesia research, reanalyzes published reports using the up-and-down method for the study of the epidural relief of pain during labor, and discusses appropriate inferences from up-and-down method studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pace, N. L., Stylianou, M. P., & Warltier, D. C. (2007). Advances in and Limitations of Up-and-down Methodology. Anesthesiology, 107(1), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.anes.0000267514.42592.2a

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free