Cost-Effectiveness of Low-Dose Colchicine Prophylaxis When Starting Allopurinol Using the “Start-Low Go-Slow” Approach for Gout: Evidence From a Noninferiority Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of low-dose colchicine prophylaxis for preventing gout flares when starting allopurinol using the “start-low go-slow” approach. Methods: Participants with gout, fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology recommendations for starting urate-lowering therapy and with serum urate ≥0.36 mmol/L (6 mg/dL), were randomly allocated (1:1) to either colchicine (0.5 mg daily) or placebo for six months with a further six-month follow-up. All participants received allopurinol, with monthly increase in dose to achieve target urate <0.36 mmol/L. The primary outcomes were incremental cost-effectiveness at the 6-month and 1-year follow-up from the health system perspective, measured by incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) at a willingness-to-pay threshold equivalent to gross domestic product per capita. Results: Two hundred participants were randomized to either colchicine (n = 100) or placebo (n = 100). Mean costs were higher in the colchicine group over both six months and one year (adjusted mean difference $1,848 [95% confidence interval (CI) −$321 to $4,017] and $2,282 [95% CI −$173 to $4,737], respectively). Quality-adjusted life years were slightly higher in the colchicine group over six months (adjusted mean difference 0.008 [95% CI −0.020 to 0.035]) but lower over one year (−0.015 [95% CI −0.039 to 0.010]). Treatment with colchicine was not found to be cost-effective at either 6 months or 12 months (INMB −$1,373 [95% CI −$4,287 to $1,542] and −$3,191 [95% CI −$6,274 to −$107], probability of cost-effectiveness 17.7% and 1.5%, respectively). Similar results were obtained from a societal perspective. Conclusion: Six months of low-dose colchicine prophylaxis when starting allopurinol using the “start-low go-slow” approach is unlikely to be cost-effective over 12 months.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pryymachenko, Y., Wilson, R., Dalbeth, N., Abbott, J. H., & Stamp, L. (2026). Cost-Effectiveness of Low-Dose Colchicine Prophylaxis When Starting Allopurinol Using the “Start-Low Go-Slow” Approach for Gout: Evidence From a Noninferiority Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial. Arthritis Care and Research, 78(3), 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25631

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free