Assessing the position of the tracheal tube The reliability of different methods

107Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Various methods have been developed to confirm proper intubation of the trachea. This blind, randomised study evaluates some of these quantitatively and qualitatively. Forty patients had both their trachea and oesophagus intubated. A procedure that included auscultation of the upper abdomen and lungs was 100% reliable independent of which tube was ventilated. Auscultation of the lungs resulted in a wrong conclusion in 15% (6–30, 95% confidence limits) of the cases when the oesophagus was ventilated: the sounds were misinterpretated as normal breath sounds. Suction on the tubes with a 60‐ml syringe was also a reliable test. Other methods assessed were observation for condensation of water vapor, and abnormal movements of the upper abdomen; these were unreliable. Copyright © 1989, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Andersen, K. H., & Hald, A. (1989). Assessing the position of the tracheal tube The reliability of different methods. Anaesthesia, 44(12), 984–985. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb09203.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free