Malaria vaccine efficacy: The difficulty of detecting and diagnosing malaria

25Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

New sources of funding have revitalized efforts to control malaria. An effective vaccine would be a tremendous asset in the fight against this devastating disease and increasing financial and scientific resources are being invested to develop one. A few candidates have been tested in Phase I and II clinical trials, and several others are poised to begin trials soon. Some studies have been promising, and others disappointing. It is difficult to compare the results of these clinical trials; even independent trials of the same vaccine give highly discrepant results. One major obstacle in evaluating malaria vaccines is the difficulty of diagnosing clinical malaria. This analysis evaluates the impact of diagnostic error, particularly that introduced by microscopy, on the outcome of efficacy trials of malaria vaccines and make recommendations for improving future trials. © 2007 O'Meara et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Meara, W. P., Hall, B. F., & McKenzie, F. E. (2007). Malaria vaccine efficacy: The difficulty of detecting and diagnosing malaria. Malaria Journal. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-6-36

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free