Is More Always Better? Government Attention and Environmental Governance Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from China

9Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In recent years, the thorough implementation of China’s green development concept has compelled local governments to devote more attention to environmental issues. This study aimed to verify whether increased government environmental attention (GEA) can sustainably ensure the implementation of environmental governance, particularly air pollution control. Using government work reports (GWRs) from local governments, this study employed machine learning methods to identify and quantify the attitudes of government officials as expressed in policy texts. A weighted dictionary method was used to quantify GEA from 2011 to 2016. The results of spatial econometric models indicated that air pollution exhibited positive spatial clustering effects across different regions, with the Yangtze River Delta and the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region being classified as high–high areas, while the western regions were classified as low–low areas. Baseline regression results showed that increased GEA can improve the effectiveness of pollution control, but excessive attention leads to a decline in governance efficiency. Overall, this study helps explain the unsustainability of campaign-style environmental governance and provides guidance for local governments on the rational allocation of attention when addressing environmental issues.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, F., Zhou, M., & Yu, H. (2024). Is More Always Better? Government Attention and Environmental Governance Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167146

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free