New insights into plants co-existence in species-rich communities: The pollination interaction perspective

37Citations
Citations of this article
91Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Questions: In animal-mediated pollination, pollinators can be regarded as a limiting resource for which entomophilous plant species might interact to assure pollination, an event pivotal for their reproduction and population maintenance. At community level, spatially aggregated co-flowering species can thus be expected to exhibit suitable suites of traits to avoid competition and ensure pollination. We explored the problem by answering the following questions: (1) are co-flowering species specialized on different guilds of pollinators; (2) do co-flowering pollinator-sharing species segregate spatially; and (3) do co-flowering pollinator-sharing species that diverge in anther position spatially aggregate more than those that converge in anther position?. Study Site: Euganean Hills, NE Italy. Methods: Plant composition, flowering phenology and interactions between each entomophilous plant species and pollinating insects were monitored every 15 days in 40 permanent plots placed in an area of 16 ha. We quantified the degree of flowering synchrony, pollinator-sharing and spatial aggregation between each pair of entomophilous species. We then tested the relationship between the degree of co-flowering, pollinator-sharing and spatial aggregation, and between spatial aggregation and anther position. Results: Entomophilous species converged, at least partially in flowering time, and the phenological synchronization of flowering was significantly associated with the sharing of pollinator guilds. Co-flowering pollinator-sharing species segregated spatially. Furthermore, co-flowering pollinator-sharing species that diverged in anther position aggregated more than those that converged in anther position. Conclusions: Reproductive traits that facilitate the co-existence of co-flowering species include specialization on different pollinator guilds and a phenological displacement of the flowering time. Furthermore, in circumstances of increased competition due to phenological synchronization, pollinator-sharing and spatial aggregation, the chance of effective pollination might depend on differences in anther position, resulting in a divergent pollen placement on pollinator bodies. One of the most interesting results we obtained is that the presence of one mechanism does not preclude the operation of others, and each plant species can simultaneously exhibit different strategies. Although more studies are needed, our results can provide additional information about plant–plant interactions and provide new insights into mechanisms allowing the co-existence of a high number of plant species in local communities.

References Powered by Scopus

Pollination syndromes and floral specialization

1721Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters

1512Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Vegetation of Europe: hierarchical floristic classification system of vascular plant, bryophyte, lichen, and algal communities

1129Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Plant–environment interactions through a functional traits perspective: a review of Italian studies

59Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The neglected importance of floral traits in trait-based plant community assembly

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Linkage between species traits and plant phenology in an alpine meadow

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fantinato, E., Del Vecchio, S., Giovanetti, M., Acosta, A. T. R., & Buffa, G. (2018). New insights into plants co-existence in species-rich communities: The pollination interaction perspective. Journal of Vegetation Science, 29(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12592

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 32

57%

Researcher 15

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45

66%

Environmental Science 21

31%

Chemistry 1

1%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

1%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free