Live birth chances in women with extremely low-serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels

70Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: To determine whether women with extremely low-serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels (<0.10.4 ng/ml) still demonstrate live birth potential with assisted reproduction and whether such potential is age dependent. Methods: Between January 2006 and October 2009, 128 consecutive infertility patients with AMH ≤0.4 ng/ml were retrospectively evaluated for pregnancy chances and live birth rates after IVF. Results: Patients presented at a mean (±SD) age of 40.8 ± 4.1 years, with mean (±SD) baseline FSH of 15.7 ± 11.1 mIU/ml and mean (±SD) AMH of 0.2 ± 0.1 ng/ml. One hundred and twenty-eight women underwent a total of 254 IVF cycles. Twenty clinical pregnancies were recorded (7.9 per cycle start [95 confidence interval (CI): 4.911.9]; 15.6 cumulative [CI: 9.823.1]). These pregnancies resulted in 13 live births in 12 women (i.e. 11 singletons and a pair of twins) and 8 patients miscarried. Eight deliveries occurred after the first cycle (6.3 per cycle start) and four after subsequent IVF cycles (3.2). When evaluated according to female age, 70 women ≤42 years presented with 16 clinical pregnancies that resulted in 10 deliveries (14.3), while 58 patients >42 years presented with four clinical pregnancies that resulted in 2 deliveries (3.4), representing a reduced pregnancy chance (P= 0.013) and delivery rate (P 0.036) versus age ≤42 years. Conclusions: With extremely low-serum AMH levels, moderate, but reasonable pregnancy and live birth rates are still possible. Extremely low AMH levels do not seem to represent an appropriate marker for withholding fertility treatment. © 2011 The Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weghofer, A., Dietrich, W., Barad, D. H., & Gleicher, N. (2011). Live birth chances in women with extremely low-serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels. Human Reproduction, 26(7), 1905–1909. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der134

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free