What predicts an advanced-stage diagnosis of breast cancer? sorting out the influence of method of detection, access to care, and biologic factors

24Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Multiple studies have yielded important findings regarding the determinants of an advanced-stage diagnosis of breast cancer. We seek to advance this line of inquiry through a broadened conceptual framework and accompanying statistical modeling strategy that recognize the dual importance of access-tocare and biologic factors on stage. Methods: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-sponsored Breast and Prostate Cancer Data Quality and Patterns of Care Study yielded a seven-state, cancer registry-derived population-based sample of 9,142 women diagnosed with a first primary in situ or invasive breast cancer in 2004. The likelihood of advanced-stage cancer (American Joint Committee on Cancer IIIB, IIIC, or IV) was investigated through multivariable regression modeling, with base-case analyses using the method of instrumental variables (IV) to detect and correct for possible selection bias. The robustness of base-case findings was examined through extensive sensitivity analyses. Results: Advanced-stage disease was negatively associated with detection by mammography (P < 0.001) and with age < 50 (P < 0.001), and positively related to black race (P = 0.07), not being privately insured [Medicaid (P = 0.01), Medicare (P = 0.04), uninsured (P = 0.07)], being single (P = 0.06), body mass index > 40 (P= 0.001), a HER2 type tumor (P < 0.001), and tumor grade not well differentiated (P < 0.001). This IV model detected and adjusted for significant selection effects associated with method of detection (P=0.02). Sensitivity analyses generally supported these base-case results. Conclusions: Through our comprehensive modeling strategy andsensitivity analyses,weprovide newestimates of themagnitude androbustness of the determinants ofadvanced-stage breast cancer. Impact: Statistical approaches frequently used to address observational data biases in treatment-outcome studies can be applied similarly in analyses of the determinants of stage at diagnosis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lipscomb, J., Fleming, S. T., Trentham-Dietz, A., Kimmick, G., Wu, X. C., Morris, C. R., … Sabatino, S. A. (2016). What predicts an advanced-stage diagnosis of breast cancer? sorting out the influence of method of detection, access to care, and biologic factors. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, 25(4), 613–623. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0225

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free