Reducing incision length or intensifying rehabilitation: What makes the difference to length of stay in total hip replacement in a UK setting?

17Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Minimal-incision surgery for hip arthroplasty and intensive post-op physiotherapy have both been shown to allow early mobilisation and to reduce hospital stay. Forty-five patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty using a standard posterior approach were compared with 51 patients using a minimal incision. In both groups, physiotherapy involved either a routine or intensive regime. Patients were matched in age, sex and body mass index. There was no significant difference in blood loss, post-operative stay and change in Oxford hip scores at one year between the mini- and standard-incision groups. There was a significant difference (P=0.003) in length of stay between routine- and intensive-physiotherapy groups (11.4 vs. 7.9 days). The dislocation rate was higher in the mini-incision group. This study suggests that in a standard UK setting, intensive physiotherapy can significantly decrease in-patient stay, but reducing the incision length does not. © Springer-Verlag 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peck, C. N., Foster, A., & McLauchlan, G. J. (2006). Reducing incision length or intensifying rehabilitation: What makes the difference to length of stay in total hip replacement in a UK setting? International Orthopaedics, 30(5), 395–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0091-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free