Multiple myeloma: routes to diagnosis, clinical characteristics and survival – findings from a UK population-based study

50Citations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Prompt cancer diagnosis may align UK survival with European averages. We examined the impact of route to diagnosis on survival for multiple myeloma patients diagnosed 2012–2013 using data from our population-based patient cohort that links to national death notifications and collects details on treatment and response (n = 441). Emergency presentation was associated with advanced disease and poorer outcomes, and was the commonest route to diagnosis (28·1%) followed by General Practitioner urgent (19·0%) and two-week wait (17·2%) referrals. CRAB (elevated Calcium, Renal failure, Anaemia, Bone lesions) distribution varied by route (P < 0·001), with patients with emergency presentations most likely to have ≥2 features and significantly worse survival (log-rank test χ2 = 13·8, P = 0·0002).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Howell, D., Smith, A., Appleton, S., Bagguley, T., Macleod, U., Cook, G., … Roman, E. (2017). Multiple myeloma: routes to diagnosis, clinical characteristics and survival – findings from a UK population-based study. British Journal of Haematology, 177(1), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.14513

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free