Comparison of two views of maximum entropy in biodiversity: Frank (2011) and Pueyo et al. (2007)

1Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

An increasing number of authors agree in that the maximum entropy principle (MaxEnt) is essential for the understanding of macroecological patterns. However, there are subtle but crucial differences among the approaches by several of these authors. This poses a major obstacle for anyone interested in applying the methodology of MaxEnt in this context. In a recent publication, Frank (2011) gives some arguments why his own approach would represent an improvement as compared to the earlier paper by Pueyo et al. (2007) and also to the views by Edwin T. Jaynes, who first formulated MaxEnt in the context of statistical physics. Here I show that his criticisms are flawed and that there are fundamental reasons to prefer the original approach.© 2012 The Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pueyo, S. (2012). Comparison of two views of maximum entropy in biodiversity: Frank (2011) and Pueyo et al. (2007). Ecology and Evolution, 2(5), 988–993. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.231

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free