Using likelihood ratios to detect invalid performance with performance validity measures

57Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Larrabee (2008) applied chained likelihood ratios to selected performance validity measures (PVMs) to identify non-valid performances on neuropsychological tests. He presented a method of combining different PVMs with different sensitivities and specificities into an overall probability of non-validity. We applied his methodology to a set of 11 PVMs using a sample of 255 subjects. The results of the study show that in various combinations of two or three PVMs, a high reliability of invalidity can be determined using the chained likelihood ratio method. This study advances the ability of clinicians to chain various PVMs together and calculate the probability that a set of data is invalid. © 2014 The Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meyers, J. E., Miller, R. M., Thompson, L. M., Scalese, A. M., Allred, B. C., Rupp, Z. W., … Junghyun Lee, A. (2014). Using likelihood ratios to detect invalid performance with performance validity measures. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 29(3), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acu001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free