Identification and Characteristics of Co-isolation of Multiple Nontuberculous Mycobacteria

8Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective Although multiple nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) species can be isolated from the same patient, little has been reported on co-isolation. We clarified the trends and characteristics of the co-isolation of multiple NTM species. Methods To collect data on multiple NTM isolation, we first extracted all patients who visited our hospital from 2006 through 2015 with a diagnosis of NTM lung diseases other than Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and then reviewed their medical records to evaluate the co-isolation of multiple NTM species. Results Of 213 patients with non-MAC lung disease, the most common NTM species was M. gordonae (32%), followed by M. kansasii (20%) and M. abscessus (14%). Non-MAC NTM lung disease tended to be associated with middle age with a low body mass index and male predominance. Multiple NTM species were isolated from 55 (26%) of the 213 patients. The clinical characteristics associated with multiple NTM species isolation included female predominance, never smokers and the absence of cavity lesions in the lungs. The highest co-isolation rate was observed in patients with M. gordonae isolation (30%), followed by M. furtuitum isolation (26%) and M. abscessus isolation (20%). Only MAC was isolated when co-isolated with M. abscessus. Among M. szulgai, M. peregrinum and M. terrae isolation, no other NTM species were detected. Conclusion Co-isolation of multiple NTM species was not uncommon, with 26% of patients with non-MAC NTM lung diseases showing co-isolation with multiple NTM species. Each NTM species had distinct characteristics in terms of co-isolation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Asaoka, M., Hagiwara, E., Etori, S., Higa, K., Ikeda, S., Sekine, A., … Ogura, T. (2021). Identification and Characteristics of Co-isolation of Multiple Nontuberculous Mycobacteria. Internal Medicine, 60(20), 3213–3219. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.5300-20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free