Bribery in voting with soft constraints

18Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We consider a multi-agent scenario where a collection of agents needs to select a common decision from a large set of decisions over which they express their preferences. This decision set has a combinatorial structure, that is, each decision is an element of the Cartesian product of the domains of some variables. Agents express their preferences over the decisions via soft constraints. We consider both sequential preference aggregation methods (they aggregate the preferences over one variable at a time) and one-step methods and we study the computational complexity of influencing them through bribery. We prove that bribery is NPcomplete for the sequential aggregation methods (based on Plurality, Approval, and Borda) for most of the cost schemes we defined, while it is polynomial for one-step Plurality. Copyright © 2013, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pini, M. S., Rossi, F., & Venable, K. B. (2013). Bribery in voting with soft constraints. In Proceedings of the 27th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2013 (pp. 803–809). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v27i1.8586

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free