Which is primary: Preference or perceived instoration?

27Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There is a lack of consensus on whether preference informs evaluations of urban and natural scenes as psychologically restorative or instorative, or whether instorative perceptions inform preference. Perceptions of restorative potential and outcomes without a prior stress intervention are called instorative. In two online experimental studies conducted across long (N = 140) and short (N = 110) timeframes, we show a primacy effect for instorative perceptions; that is, evaluations of the instorative benefits of a scene are better predictors of ratings of preference than preference ratings of perceived instorative benefits. This was true for both natural and urban types of scenes. We found support for perceived instoration and affective appraisals being similarly strong and independent mediators. Their relative share in affecting preference or perceived instorativeness could not be reliably differentiated. Examination of thoughts, memories, and identity elicited by viewing such scenes may further clarify relationships between environmental preference and instoration.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Korpela, K. M., & Ratcliffe, E. (2021). Which is primary: Preference or perceived instoration? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101617

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free