Peak oil futures: Same crisis, different responses

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Peak oil theory predicts that global oil production will soon start a terminal decline. Most proponents of the theory imply that no adequate alternate resource and technology will be available to replace oil as the backbone resource of industrial society. To understand what may happen if the proponents of peak oil theory are right, I analyze the historical experience of countries that have gone through a comparable experience. Japan (1918-1945), North Korea (1990s) and Cuba (1990s) have all been facing severe oil supply disruptions in the order of 20% or more. Despite the unique features of each case, it is possible to derive clues on how different parts of the world would react to a global energy crunch. The historical record suggests at least three possible peak oil trajectories: predatory militarism, totalitarian retrenchment, and socioeconomic adaptation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Friedrichs, J. (2012). Peak oil futures: Same crisis, different responses. In Energy, Transport, & the Environment: Addressing the Sustainable Mobility Paradigm (Vol. 9781447127178, pp. 55–75). Springer-Verlag London Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2717-8_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free