Microsampling for quantitative bioanalysis, an industry update: Output from an AAPS/EBF survey

43Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There is continuing interest in the development and application of various microsampling technologies for drug development. The AAPS bioanalytical community microsampling subgroup and the European Bioanalysis Forum conducted a survey of their members (39 individual organizations). This gives a snapshot of current practices and demonstrates that implementation of microsampling approaches is becoming increasingly commonplace, but not universal. Greater adoption was observed for nonclinical studies, particularly nonregulatory. A number of respondents reported that they have included microsampling data in regulatory submissions. Another important observation was that where microsampling is employed for clinical studies, dried blood approaches predominate, reflecting the interest in their use where they enable sample collection which is not feasible with standard approaches or to derive richer data sets.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Patel, S. R., Bryan, P., Spooner, N., Timmerman, P., & Wickremsinhe, E. (2019). Microsampling for quantitative bioanalysis, an industry update: Output from an AAPS/EBF survey. Bioanalysis, 11(7), 619–628. https://doi.org/10.4155/bio-2019-0019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free