Clinical trial: Knowledge of negative Helicobacter pylori status reduces subsequent dyspepsia-related resource use

12Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Background: Screening for Helicobacter pylori reduces dyspepsia and dyspepsia-related costs in positive individuals. Aims: To assess effect of knowledge of H. pylori status on healthcare-seeking in negative individuals. Methods: H. pylori-negative subjects in a community screening programme were randomized to placebo triple therapy or informed of their negative H. pylori status. Dyspepsia-related resource data were extracted from primary care records at 2 years, and National Health Service reference costs were applied to calculate the total cost per subject. Proportions of individuals incurring any cost were compared using a relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Differences in costs were compared using an independent sample t-test. Results: A total of 1353 H. pylori-negative individuals were randomized to placebo whilst 1355 were informed of their infection status. In the placebo arm, 212 (16%) subsequently incurred any dyspepsia-related cost compared to 172 (13%) informed of their infection status (RR of incurring cost = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.67-0.97). Those informed of their infection status incurred lower costs (mean saving per individual = £11.02; 95% CI: -£3.52 to 25.56). Conclusions: H. pylori-negative individuals informed of infection status sought health care for dyspepsia less often than those who were unaware. Population screening may reduce dyspepsia-related costs in uninfected, as well as infected individuals. © 2007 The Authors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ford, A. C., Forman, D., Nathan, J., Crocombe, W. D., Axon, A. T. R., & Moayyedi, P. (2007). Clinical trial: Knowledge of negative Helicobacter pylori status reduces subsequent dyspepsia-related resource use. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 26(9), 1267–1275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03500.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free