Abstract
Over the past 50 years, the diversity of fisheries types being actively managed has changed from mainly data-rich, industrial sectors to more socially, economically, and environmentally complex multispecies and multisector fisheries. Accompanying this change has been a broadening of management objectives to include social and economic considerations with traditional resource sustainability objectives, the so-called triple bottom line, and the need to include these considerations into harvest strategies. The case of a line fishery in Australia's Great Barrier Reef is used as a demonstration of the first steps in implementing triple bottom line harvest strategies. This fishery has several disparate sectors including commercial, tourism, and recreation; targets multiple but important reef species; and is undertaken in a World Heritage Site. This work highlights the need for a much-expanded set of objectives elicited from stakeholders that are either included in the trade-off analyses of the different harvest strategies or directly in an optimization. Both options demonstrated that a paradigm shift is required to emphasize representative participatory management systems that assemble teams from quite different backgrounds and viewpoints; use much broader set of objectives; and modify tools and (especially) the data collected within revised monitoring programmes to underpin these tools.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Dichmont, C. M., Dowling, N. A., Pascoe, S., Cannard, T., Pears, R. J., Breen, S., … Mangel, M. (2021, March 1). Operationalizing triple bottom line harvest strategies. ICES Journal of Marine Science. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsaa033
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.