Routine Supercritical Fluid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for Determination of Vitamin K1 Extracted from Serum with a 96-Well Solid-Phase Extraction Method

10Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The concentration of vitamin K1 in serum or plasma is the most common index for assessing vitamin K status. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a rapid and reliable routine method for quantifying vitamin K1 above 0.1 ng/mL. Semi-automation of a simple sample preparation with fast analysis by supercritical fluid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (SFC-MS/MS) was exploited. Methods: Vitamin K1 was extracted from 250-μL serum samples by the use of protein precipitation and reversed-phase solid-phase extraction (SPE) in 96-well plates and quantified by SFC on a 2.1 × 100 mm Torus 1-Aminoanthracene (1-AA) column in 3.8 min with electrospray ionization - tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) detection. Results: This method shows good linearity in the concentration range of 0.1-50 ng/mL with a correlation coefficient of R 2 >0.999. Imprecision was satisfactory, with repeatability and reproducibility <10% CV. The lower limit of the measuring interval was 0.1 ng/mL, and no systematic bias was observed for the method, which used vitamin K1-d7 as internal standard. Recovery of vitamin K1 in external quality controls was satisfactory compared to other laboratories participating in the external quality assurance scheme. The method is currently in routine use for analysis of serum samples. Conclusions: The method allows high-throughput reliable determination of vitamin K1 in serum in the range 0.1-50 ng/mL.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sandvik, T. A., Husa, A., Buchmann, M., & Lundanes, E. (2017). Routine Supercritical Fluid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for Determination of Vitamin K1 Extracted from Serum with a 96-Well Solid-Phase Extraction Method. Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine, 1(6), 637–648. https://doi.org/10.1373/jalm.2016.021717

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free