Comparative evaluation of N-acetylcysteine and chlorhexidine as final irrigation on the push-out bond strength of different sealers: An in vitro study

7Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aim: Using N acetyl cysteine (NAC) and Chlorhexidine as final irrigants, the study aims to examine the push out bond strength of distinct sealers. Materials and Methods: Access and biomechanical preparation were done on decoronated 80 single-rooted teeth. Canals were alternatively irrigated using 5ml of 5.25% NaOCl and 5ml of 17% EDTA solution during instrumentation. On the basis of final irrigation procedure, the samples are divided into two groups: Group 1 - NAC and Group 2 - 2% Chlorhexidine. Using paper points, canals were dried and subdivided depending on the sealers used, Group 1A and 2A- AH plus and 1B and 2B- BioRoot RCS. Teeth were obturated and middle root sections were tested for push-out bond strength using universal testing equipment. Statistical analysis was done. Results: NAC with AH-plus sealer had the maximum push-out strength, whereas Chlorhexidine with BioRoot RCS sealer had the lowest. Conclusion: NAC increases the bond strength of the obturating materials as the final irrigant. NAC can be considered as a final irrigant for endodontic therapy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ghatole, K., Indi, S., Diwanji, P., Janavathi, Hambire, A., & Thimwala, A. (2022). Comparative evaluation of N-acetylcysteine and chlorhexidine as final irrigation on the push-out bond strength of different sealers: An in vitro study. Endodontology, 34(3), 180–183. https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_81_22

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free