Evaluation of the revised sense of coherence scale in a representative German sample

14Citations
Citations of this article
90Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and objectives To evaluate the Revised Sense of Coherence (SOC-R) scale in a large representative German sample. Design A nationwide household survey involving a total of 2510 face-to-face interviews. Methods In addition to the SOC-R, childhood trauma and maltreatment (CTM), lifetime traumatic events (Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, CTQ, and the Life Events Checklist for DSM-5, LEC-5), and mental health (Patient Health Questionnaire, PHQ-4) were assessed. Results The final sample consisted of N = 2373 participants (52.3% females; M = 48.24 years). Confirmatory factor analyses confirmed a three-factor structure for the SOC-R (‘manageability’, ‘balance’, ‘reflection’) with acceptable indices (RMSEA .066; 90% CI [.062, .071]). Reliability analyses revealed good internal consistency (α = .87). Construct validity was supported by significant but low correlations with psychopathology. Gender marginally influenced SOC-R (t = 1.99, p = .05). Moderation analyses revealed that SOC-R exerted a protective impact on depression in the context of CTQ (t = 2.29, p < .05) and lifetime traumatic events (t = –2.37, p < .05). Conclusions This study supports the psychometric properties of the SOC-R and emphasizes the importance of considering salutogenic effects to better understand interindividual differences in the effect of adversity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thoma, M. V., Mc Gee, S. L., Fegert, J. M., Glaesmer, H., Brähler, E., & Maercker, A. (2018). Evaluation of the revised sense of coherence scale in a representative German sample. PLoS ONE, 13(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209550

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free