Threats and the conservative shift in public opinion: comparative causal mediation analyses from Turkey

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

How do mortality reminders and aroused mortality fear affect people’s conservatism? Threats-politics studies assume that life-threatening dangers, fear of death, and conservatism go together, overlooking the distinction between threat exposure and mortality fear arousal. Further, these studies commonly fixate on the conventional threat of terrorism and predominantly employ samples from Western countries. Complementing past research, I use three survey experiments in Turkey to investigate the relationship between a broad array of threats (terrorism, health risks, moral hazards, and daily thoughts of death’s inevitability), mortality fear induced by the threats, and self-rated conservative orientation in a causal mediation analysis framework, using the terror management theory and non-representative Facebook samples (2018, 2020). The results reveal that the respondents receiving threatening stimuli (particularly terrorism mortality reminder) become less conservative as the mortality fear elevates. The length of mortality priming and the broader study context influence this indirect effect’s significance and replicability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Erol, F. (2024). Threats and the conservative shift in public opinion: comparative causal mediation analyses from Turkey. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 24(4), 815–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2023.2189541

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free